<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Backstabber Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://backstabberreport.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://backstabberreport.com</link>
	<description>Revealing The Backstabbers In History and Today... Beware The Ides of March!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ashton Kutcher And Demi Moore Announce Divorce by Julius Caesar</title>
		<link>http://backstabberreport.com/ashton-kutcher-and-demi-moore-announce-divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Julius Caesar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backstabberreport.com/?p=1328#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thanks, &lt;strong&gt;MS&lt;/strong&gt; Pittsburg for only reinforcing my position and proving those without a valid argument resort to insults.

 However, I didn&#039;t say it was saggy. I said it has begun to sag. &quot;...once her age lines appeared more prominently and her ass began to sag.&quot; That being in comparison to her, &lt;em&gt;when she was 28. &lt;/em&gt;
Only a woman would get angry at honesty... or maybe I struck a chord that hits close to home for you? 

BTW, if you think the age difference had nothing to do with it... you need a reality check. MILF&#039;s are fun, but marriage? Bad choice for him to make. If she was set on having a girl toy, she should expect to get played in return.

I agree with you on one point. Celebrities stray. All the more reason this bond was doomed to failure.

Love You Too,
Admin (A.K.A., &quot;Stupid Nimrod&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, <strong>MS</strong> Pittsburg for only reinforcing my position and proving those without a valid argument resort to insults.</p>
<p> However, I didn&#8217;t say it was saggy. I said it has begun to sag. &#8220;&#8230;once her age lines appeared more prominently and her ass began to sag.&#8221; That being in comparison to her, <em>when she was 28. </em><br />
Only a woman would get angry at honesty&#8230; or maybe I struck a chord that hits close to home for you? </p>
<p>BTW, if you think the age difference had nothing to do with it&#8230; you need a reality check. MILF&#8217;s are fun, but marriage? Bad choice for him to make. If she was set on having a girl toy, she should expect to get played in return.</p>
<p>I agree with you on one point. Celebrities stray. All the more reason this bond was doomed to failure.</p>
<p>Love You Too,<br />
Admin (A.K.A., &#8220;Stupid Nimrod&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ashton Kutcher And Demi Moore Announce Divorce by MsPittsburgh</title>
		<link>http://backstabberreport.com/ashton-kutcher-and-demi-moore-announce-divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>MsPittsburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backstabberreport.com/?p=1328#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Demi Moore&#039;s 14 year age difference with Ashton Kutcher has nothing to do with cheating and I highly doubt she has a saggy ass you stupid nimrod. 

His cheating is a direct result of his marrying at the ripe age of 28.....in simple terms...he was too young to get married and now he&#039;s bored and feels like he&#039;s missing out.   People cheat for various reasons, but I&#039;ve seen Demi Moore in person and trust me.....there is nothing &quot;saggy&quot; about her ass OR the rest of her body. It&#039;s not the age difference. It wouldn&#039;t have mattered if he married someone around his own age, he still would have gotten bored and strayed....it&#039;s what people do.....especially celebrities</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demi Moore&#8217;s 14 year age difference with Ashton Kutcher has nothing to do with cheating and I highly doubt she has a saggy ass you stupid nimrod. </p>
<p>His cheating is a direct result of his marrying at the ripe age of 28&#8230;..in simple terms&#8230;he was too young to get married and now he&#8217;s bored and feels like he&#8217;s missing out.   People cheat for various reasons, but I&#8217;ve seen Demi Moore in person and trust me&#8230;..there is nothing &#8220;saggy&#8221; about her ass OR the rest of her body. It&#8217;s not the age difference. It wouldn&#8217;t have mattered if he married someone around his own age, he still would have gotten bored and strayed&#8230;.it&#8217;s what people do&#8230;..especially celebrities</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The U.S. As A Debtor Nation Is A Repeat Of Rome by Warlord</title>
		<link>http://backstabberreport.com/the-u-s-as-a-debtor-nation-is-a-repeat-of-rome/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Warlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backstabberreport.com/?p=1125#comment-3</guid>
		<description>@ Baird
What did you do, C&amp;P your comment from somewhere else to get a backlink? I hope the link is removed because it&#039;s obvious you just wanted to post for a link. 

There was nothing said in the post about &quot;Weimer/Zimbabwe&quot; and if you really think Mosler has the answer... you are as nutty as he is - and Warren Mosler is insane. I think he dealt with stocks for too long and we saw what happened when dotcom&#039;s rose in price with no real value to them.

According to him the government can cook the books without any consequence. It&#039;s only a matter of data entry by changing the numbers on each end? Put a bigger number in the receiver&#039;s account and increase the debt number on the federal side? Create more wealth by creating more money for the people? Just issue more treasury notes to China without consequence? Germany thought the same way after WWI and had a far greater depression than the rest of the world.

Such a simple solution  it&#039;s amazing the greatest economic minds in the world didn&#039;t think of it. 

All the U.S. has to do is give everyone all the money they need to pay off their credit cards, mortgages, car payments, and everything else they owe. No more debt and problem solved, right?

So, in essence, we put people to work building something... let&#039;s say tanks. They get paid and we take all those tanks they build and dump them in the ocean. Then we repeat the process. Following Mosler&#039;s philosophy this should work to keep everyone employed and making money. If only it were so simple.

How do people believe Mosler&#039;s s**t?

Again, the more money in circulation, the more worthless it becomes if there is no real, tangible wealth to support it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Baird<br />
What did you do, C&#038;P your comment from somewhere else to get a backlink? I hope the link is removed because it&#8217;s obvious you just wanted to post for a link. </p>
<p>There was nothing said in the post about &#8220;Weimer/Zimbabwe&#8221; and if you really think Mosler has the answer&#8230; you are as nutty as he is &#8211; and Warren Mosler is insane. I think he dealt with stocks for too long and we saw what happened when dotcom&#8217;s rose in price with no real value to them.</p>
<p>According to him the government can cook the books without any consequence. It&#8217;s only a matter of data entry by changing the numbers on each end? Put a bigger number in the receiver&#8217;s account and increase the debt number on the federal side? Create more wealth by creating more money for the people? Just issue more treasury notes to China without consequence? Germany thought the same way after WWI and had a far greater depression than the rest of the world.</p>
<p>Such a simple solution  it&#8217;s amazing the greatest economic minds in the world didn&#8217;t think of it. </p>
<p>All the U.S. has to do is give everyone all the money they need to pay off their credit cards, mortgages, car payments, and everything else they owe. No more debt and problem solved, right?</p>
<p>So, in essence, we put people to work building something&#8230; let&#8217;s say tanks. They get paid and we take all those tanks they build and dump them in the ocean. Then we repeat the process. Following Mosler&#8217;s philosophy this should work to keep everyone employed and making money. If only it were so simple.</p>
<p>How do people believe Mosler&#8217;s s**t?</p>
<p>Again, the more money in circulation, the more worthless it becomes if there is no real, tangible wealth to support it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The U.S. As A Debtor Nation Is A Repeat Of Rome by Jim Baird</title>
		<link>http://backstabberreport.com/the-u-s-as-a-debtor-nation-is-a-repeat-of-rome/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Baird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backstabberreport.com/?p=1125#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I.O.U.S.A is a crock of s**t, as is everything that comes out of the Peterson folks.  

I&#039;m sorry, but you are barking up the wrong tree, here.   The fact is, there IS a difference between a country (especially a country that issues it&#039;s own currency in a floating exchange rate regime, and an individual.  Yes, issueing too much money can lead to inflation, but only when the economy is running at or near full capacity, which we are very, very far from.  

As for the Weimar/Zimbabwe issue, here&#039;s a good overview of the real cause of those problems:

Briefly, the problem in both cases was the massive supply shock brought about by the destruction of most of the economic base of the country (by war and onerous reparations in one case, plain mismanagement  and theft in the other) The hyperinflation was an effect of that.

Our current situation is much more analagous to Japan in the 90s, which engaged in (relatively) huge deficit spending, and yet sat mired in deflation and recession most of the decade.  The rating agencies downgraded them to below Botswana, and yet they can still &quot;borrow&quot; money for essentially 0%.

If you want to get a good overview of how modern monetary systems actually work, my friend Warren MOsler has written up a short little book that goes through the common misconceptions:

*Sales Link Removed By ADMIN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I.O.U.S.A is a crock of s**t, as is everything that comes out of the Peterson folks.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but you are barking up the wrong tree, here.   The fact is, there IS a difference between a country (especially a country that issues it&#8217;s own currency in a floating exchange rate regime, and an individual.  Yes, issueing too much money can lead to inflation, but only when the economy is running at or near full capacity, which we are very, very far from.  </p>
<p>As for the Weimar/Zimbabwe issue, here&#8217;s a good overview of the real cause of those problems:</p>
<p>Briefly, the problem in both cases was the massive supply shock brought about by the destruction of most of the economic base of the country (by war and onerous reparations in one case, plain mismanagement  and theft in the other) The hyperinflation was an effect of that.</p>
<p>Our current situation is much more analagous to Japan in the 90s, which engaged in (relatively) huge deficit spending, and yet sat mired in deflation and recession most of the decade.  The rating agencies downgraded them to below Botswana, and yet they can still &#8220;borrow&#8221; money for essentially 0%.</p>
<p>If you want to get a good overview of how modern monetary systems actually work, my friend Warren MOsler has written up a short little book that goes through the common misconceptions:</p>
<p>*Sales Link Removed By ADMIN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

